When I read the posts from two weeks ago about everyone's form of poetry, I noticed that a majority if not all the posts were about the lyrics of the song, as if that alone made it poetic. This is the problem with analyzing music as poetry. The whole point of music is that there is so much more than the lyrics. Isn't that the obvious separation between music and literature? One of the songs I really wanted to talk about was "Two Weeks" by FKA Twigs, because the fluidity of her electropop sound and the raspy drum progression creates a song that is kind of elegiac and induces a lot of emotion, however the lyrics themselves are no prize (and also NSFW). Nonetheless, are we to diminish the quality of that song because it doesn't fit our concept of poetry, a concept that should strictly refer to literature? When I think of music as a form of poetry, the multidimensional language does not stem from the lyrics alone, but rather the chord progressions and other musical elements that layer on the nuances that lyrics alone cannot express.
I agree completely Yohana. As with any form of literature, in music, every note is deliberately placed so as to enhance the meaning of the work. If the artist is serious about their creations, then they would only write lyrics if they fit the song, or write a song to fit the lyrics.
ReplyDelete